Thursday, 13 April 2017

IPOB faults British envoy’s position on Biafra. See Photo




THE Indigenous People of Biafra, 

IPOB, has blamed the announcement credited to 

the British High Commissioner to Nigeria, Mr. 

Paul Arkwright, concerning the disturbance for 

Biafra, describing as appalling and 

offensive to Biafrans, the emissary's position 

that the United Kingdom, UK, would remain 

firm in its support for one indivisible Nigeria. 

The High Commissioner was said to have 

put forth the expression in Kogi State where he 

conveyed an open address entitled, "Brexit: 

Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities for 

Nigeria." 

Analyzing the emissary's announcement, IPOB 

Spokespersons, Dr. Ikenna Chinaka and Mrs. 

Elegance Ukpai, said it was surprising that a 

prepared representative of Mr. Arkwright's standing 

could show numbness of international law 

also, convention concerning the privilege to individuals' 

self determination. 

They watched that not minding the self-evident 

confinements and inherent deformities of the1999 

Nigerian Constitution, power of states 

under international law was not thrown in iron 

furthermore, could, therefore, be broken, similar to the 

case on the issue of Bakassi Peninsula. 

They stated: "The point IPOB is making is to the 

impact that, in the activity of the sovereign 

powers offered on it, a manufactured creation 

like the Nigerian state or indeed whatever other 

nation, can restrain its own power or 

surrender a piece of same. 

"Reality the way things are is that the Nigerian 

state has, out of its own volition, as of now 

surrendered Nigerian sway over Bakassi 

Peninsula, which, therefore, empowers any part 

of Nigeria or area thereof to withdraw when 

they so choose, in spite of the desires and 

desire of the neo-colonialists like Mr. 

Arkwright. This is similarly valid and remains 

same for even Great Britain whom Mr. 

Arkwright speaks to in Nigeria. 

"Arkwright ought to urge the Nigerian 

government the basic of discharging its 

commitment under the UN Declaration and 

African Charter, to encourage a choice for a 

serene Biafra exit from Nigeria. 

"It is our expectation that Arkwright acknowledges this 

new reality, otherwise we would be compelled to 

draw the option inference that he set out 

to test the will and resolve of IPOB. This 

would be most heartbreaking if it somehow happened to be so 

since the unavoidable results of such an 

activity won't extra anybody trying to subvert 

the will of the Biafran individuals." 

Sit at home request not debatable 

In the interim, National Coordinator of the IPOB, 

Mr. George Onyeibe, yesterday said the May 

30 sit-at-home request by the gathering was not 

debatable. 

Onyeibe made this known to newsmen in 

Owerri with agents of IPOB from other 

states. 

He additionally charged that the utilization of Sharia law to 

attempt their detained pioneer, Nnamdi Kanu, would 

not be acknowledged by them, adding that it was a 

ploy by the Federal Government to "Islamize" 

the nation. 

He stated: " The privilege for self determination is 

presented on man by God as it is upheld by 

the unified country constitution. Biafra has an 

plan. 

"We comprehend that the utilization of Sharia law to 

attempt Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, was a course of action to 

Islamize the nation called Nigeria. Also, their 

plan is that when they utilize it on Nnamdi Kanu 

also, succeed, it will end up being a reference point 

for them. 

"From that point they will begin to utilize it against 

other individuals. I need to disclose to you that they have 

bombed in this their arrangement. The straightforward actuality, is that 

we have come to reestablish the sovereign state 

of Biafra. Which has existed before the 

mighty amalgamation of the district called 

Nigeria. 

On the issue of the sit at home request by the 

Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Oyeibe said 

that it was not debatable, adding that Biafra 

ought not be prevented. 

Onyeibe stated: " Yes, I will essentially say that 

30th of May we don't consult about it. We 

keep in mind that some of our individuals have 

been murdered. We recollect the one which 

happened during the time we were celebrating 

the President of the United States of America. 

Along these lines, I need to reveal to them that the 30th of May 

sit at home is not debatable."





No comments:

Post a Comment

Designed by Nazzy'sBlog